Skip to content
An AI-generated image of two colleagues planning at a board of sticky notes.

Made with AI. This image comes from a stock library and was generated with AI. It is not a photograph of our people or our offices. We use AI in our daily work, and we say so when we have.

Product & Technology Delivery

“We’re paying for Atlassian and getting a fraction of its value, and nobody can change Jira without breaking something.”

Architecture, migration, consolidation, Rovo and agentic capability, and the governance that keeps it clean after we leave.

Most enterprise Atlassian estates were not designed. They accumulated. A project here, a plugin there, a well-meaning admin who left in 2019, and eventually 1,800 custom project configurations nobody can change because nobody can predict what will break.

That is a solvable problem, but not by buying a different license tier. The return on this platform comes from consolidation and standardization: the tools you retire, the instances you collapse, the manual reporting you delete. We do that work, and we model what it is worth in your estate before you commit to it.

Where AI fits here

Includes Rovo and the agentic capability inside the Atlassian platform, deployed on a toolchain clean enough for it to work.

The five levels of AI capability

What the engagement contains

The actual work.

Estate assessment and license modeling

What you have, including the instances nobody owns and the licenses nobody uses, then a model of what consolidation returns in your environment rather than in a vendor composite.

Data Center to Cloud migration

Atlassian ends new Data Center subscriptions on 30 March 2026 and expires all Data Center licenses on 28 March 2029. We plan and execute the move, and tell you honestly where the license line goes up.

Standardization at scale

Collapsing bespoke configurations into a small set of governed templates. On one recent engagement that was 1,800 custom Jira projects into 14.

Rovo and agentic capability

Deploying Atlassian’s agentic features on an estate clean enough for them to return something. On a fragmented estate they amplify the mess.

Governance that survives our departure

Ownership, request paths, configuration standards, and the review cadence that stops the estate re-fragmenting the moment the program ends.

Who does the work

The people who have already done this.

Envorso staffs engagements with operators who have held the job you are hiring for. Not analysts who have studied it, and not a junior team with a template.

  • Stuart Taylor

    Chief Executive Officer

    Deputy CEO for electronics and software at VinFast; 17 years at Ford

  • Steve Tengler

    Chief Growth Officer

    30+ years in automotive product development

  • Florian Frischmuth

    Senior Vice President, Digital Engineering

    30+ years in automotive product development across OEMs and Tier 1 suppliers; most recently Executive Director at Ford

  • Sakis Kitsopanidis

    Partner, CIO Practice

    28 years at Ford and Ford Credit, including Interim CIO

  • Michael Dennis

    Partner, Enterprise Architecture

    30+ years in enterprise software — Disney, Microsoft, ExxonMobil; three patents

  • Keshav Puttaswamy

    Senior Vice President, Product Management

    25+ years — Microsoft, Atlassian, Meta

  • J. Caldwell

    Atlassian Solutions Architect and Practice Lead

    20+ years in enterprise IT operations — Disney, Expedia, AT&T Wireless; Atlassian-accredited

  • John McCauley

    Director, Portfolio Management

    16+ years in portfolio management — Deloitte, UMT Consulting Group

Proof

Where we have done this before.

Engagements where this work was the difference, with what changed and by how much.

Our position

What we think about this.

Product collections and a partner badge are table stakes; any partner can publish those. This is the argument we make about how the investment should be sequenced.

How it starts

Evaluate → Improve → Confirm. We drive.

Three steps, in order, every time, with an operator of ours driving all three. The first is deliberately small and deliberately purchasable, because nobody should commit to a transformation program before anyone has established what is actually wrong.

Two hours to find out whether we recognize your problem.

No deck, no obligation. We listen, we tell you whether we have seen this before, and we say what we think it would take. If a Jump Start is the right next step we will say so, and if it is not, we will say that too.